[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[xsl] Re: FO questions
Subject: [xsl] Re: FO questions From: senetex@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:33:29 +0100 |
Zitat von Jim Melton <jim.melton@xxxxxxx>: > It is definitely possible to put an fo:table inside another fo:table. That's good! > I don't use FOP (I use RenderX's XEP), but I would assume, based on your > experience, that fo:table-footer is not supported by that particular > version of FOP. Thats's bad! Hope there is a solution for this problem. I really do not want to change the processor because of the long time i worked with! Besides that I need an open source processor because my project is embedded into a java application. > No time to think about this...sorry. No problem, I think there should be someone else who can help, hopefully ;) > Your English is much better than my German! Thanks! This is a good opportunity to practise my English for my A - level ;) > Hope this helps, > Jim Sure, thanks ;) Greeting SeNeTeX PS: @Jim: Sorry for the two same mails, but I clicked at the wrong button ;) -------------------------------------- Ein Service von http://www.networld.at
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: FO questions, Jim Melton | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: FO questions, J.Pietschmann |
Re: [xsl] List of XSL-FO processors, senetex | Date | Re: [xsl] Not Node() but string onl, Joris Gillis |
Month |