[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Looking for a shorter mapping expression
Subject: Re: [xsl] Looking for a shorter mapping expression From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 06 Dec 2004 08:39:10 +0000 |
>>>>> "Dimtre" == Dimtre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes: Dimtre> Even the last E2 in a path expression should evaluate Dimtre> either to a sequence of nodes or a sequence of atomic Dimtre> values, but not a mixture of the two... I find this Dimtre> unreasonably restrictive Is it really so restrictive in practise? Given that E1 must be a node sequence, then even if the restriction were not there, you would still only be gaining functions of type [a] -> [a|b] where a is node() and b is atomic(). Is that so useful? -- Colin Paul Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Looking for a shorter map, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Looking for a shorter map, Dimtre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Looking for a shorter map, Dimtre Novatchev | Date | RE: [xsl] DOCTYPE in the XSL file, Pawson, David |
Month |