[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Of course. I have generated enough XSL with XSL, using the alias instruction, to know the pitfalls..
> so I'm not sure I understand your
Just that all xsl parsers I have seen stick to the stylesheet-prefix, rather than the result-prefix, which I would highly prefer.
But then again, I rarely have the opportunity to use an XSLT 2 parser...
:-P
I hope so...
Grtz
Re: [xsl] Generating XSLT
Subject: Re: [xsl] Generating XSLT From: Geert Josten <Geert.Josten@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:01:57 +0100 |
It sure is, but still quite silly that only the namespace is renamed and not the prefixes as well. In other words, just renaming the prefixes _instead_ of the namespaces would have been nicer...
you clearly have to use another namespace in the stylesheet, otherwise the elements would be taken as xslt instructions and avoiding that is the whole point of the exercise,
Of course. I have generated enough XSL with XSL, using the alias instruction, to know the pitfalls..
> so I'm not sure I understand your
suggestion to "just rename the prefixes".
Just that all xsl parsers I have seen stick to the stylesheet-prefix, rather than the result-prefix, which I would highly prefer.
But then again, I rarely have the opportunity to use an XSLT 2 parser...
:-P
so XSLT 2 engines will in practice all use the prefix specified on result-prefix rather than the prefix used in the stylesheet.
I hope so...
Grtz
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Generating XSLT, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Generating XSLT, David Carlisle |
[xsl] looping through a lookup tabl, Ann Marie Rubin | Date | Re: [xsl] Translating "(", David Carlisle |
Month |