[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] xslt processors
Subject: RE: [xsl] xslt processors From: Pieter Reint Siegers Kort <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 12:03:18 -0500 |
Most of the time, the best solution I read here on the list, is to break down the XML source files into smaller units, and then run cascading XSLTs on them, if needed. HTH, <prs/> -----Original Message----- From: Dusan Zatkovsky [mailto:zatkovsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 11:30 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt processors On Thursday 30 of September 2004 16:29, Colin Paul Adams wrote: > xsltproc. I will extend this question. Does anybody know some other and fast xslt processors written in c/c++ except xalan and xsltproc for linux? I have this problem: I want to transform big xml documents to text data. Situation: xml size=2MB XalanC transforms it ok, but speed is 4-5 times slower than xsltproc. Parsing/transforming time is 1:2. So when I run Xalan, it tooks about 8 sec to initialize and 15 sec to transform. xsltproc transform it ok with speed 4-5 times faster than XalanC. Parsing/transforming time is about 1:1 (3 and 4 seconds) xml size=17MB XalanC transforms it ok, but speed is 4-5 times slower than xsltproc. Parsing/transforming times are 20/60 sec. But xsltproc initialization tooks very long time (after 5 minutes I have killed that process). So, I can't use xsltproc to transform big xml files (and our project need to transform up to 300-400MB xml files) and can't use XalanC because low transforming speed. Anybody can help me? -- Dusan Zatkovsky
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xslt processors, Jeff Kenton | Thread | [xsl] ANN: XSLT Standard Library v1, Steve Ball |
Re: [xsl] xslt processors, Dusan Zatkovsky | Date | Re: [xsl] xslt processors, david_n_bertoni |
Month |