Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?

Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?
From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:44:09 -0400

On Oct 7, 2004, at 10:35 AM, Colin Paul Adams wrote:

My own xslt 2.0 processor should compile to the .NET platform as well
as various native architectures, and so should also run on Mono,

So what are you writing it in? I would have guessed C#, but the reference to "compile to ... various native architectures" leaves me unsure.

I haven't tested this as I don't have a windows machine, nor a compiler to target .NET, and I haven't bothered to ask anyone else to try this out yet, as it's still alpha.

Will look forward to it. The more (free) implementations, the better.

Bruce

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives, Colin Paul Adams	Thread	Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives, Colin Paul Adams
Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives, Colin Paul Adams	Date	RE: [xsl] links don't work when IE , Passin, Tom
	Month

Keywords

xslt

	XML Editor \| XML Author \| WYSIWYG Editors \| Schema Editor \| XSD Documentation \| XSL/XSLT Editor \| XQuery \| XML Databases \| SVN Client © 2002-2011 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved. \| Sitemap \| Privacy Policy \| This website was created & generated with <oXygen/>®XML Editor

xml editor

Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?