[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] schemas and xslt 2.0 (was something else)
Subject: RE: [xsl] schemas and xslt 2.0 (was something else) From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:07:36 +0100 |
You can of course validate your input against a Relax-NG schema, but Relax-NG isn't designed to generate type information, only to give a yes-or-no answer. So it doesn't produce any output that would be useful as input to XSLT processing. One day I hope to have the time to explore the use of alternative schema languages with Saxon - but my priorities for development are always first to conform to the spec, then to think about extensions. On the output side, for example, there's no reason why integrating result tree validation with stylesheet processing shouldn't work just as well with Relax NG as with XML Schema. Michael Kay > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce D'Arcus [mailto:bdarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 11 September 2004 19:42 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [xsl] schemas and xslt 2.0 (was something else) > > > On Sep 11, 2004, at 2:21 PM, Michael Kay wrote: > > > Saxon-SA implements the "schema-aware" facilities of the XSLT 2.0 > > working > > draft. This means you can: > > > > - validate your input documents against a schema > > How tied to XML Schema is this? > > While I generate XML Schemas, I author in RELAX NG, and often rely on > features unsupported elsewhere (such as attribute-based validation). > > Bruce
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] schemas and xslt 2.0 (was som, Bruce D'Arcus | Thread | Re: [xsl] schemas and xslt 2.0 (was, Jeni Tennison |
[xsl] schemas and xslt 2.0 (was som, Bruce D'Arcus | Date | Re: [xsl] Word 2003 schema and XSL, 0 8 |
Month |
Keywords