[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
On Aug 19, 2004, at 3:21 AM, Michael Kay wrote:
If the spec allows this, and since 2.0 is not final, then perhaps it "ought" to be changed? Just a thought ...
Bruce
Re: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdness
Subject: Re: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdness From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:07:40 -0400 |
On Aug 19, 2004, at 3:21 AM, Michael Kay wrote:
If there are then processing implications, it seems to me that with Jeni's simple stylesheet, Saxon ought to generate ...
I'm not sure I understand "ought". As far as conformance to the spec is concerned, I don't think this is either a "must" or a "should".
If the spec allows this, and since 2.0 is not final, then perhaps it "ought" to be changed? Just a thought ...
Bruce
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdnes, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdnes, Michael Kay |
[xsl] Naming styles, xptm | Date | RE: [xsl] Naming styles, Andrew Welch |
Month |