[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: AW: AW: AW: [xsl] commenting and documenting XSLT (small survey)
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [xsl] commenting and documenting XSLT (small survey) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 13:55:08 +0100 |
> sorry, i probably did not make myself too clear, my fault. i am not > suggesting using XHTML or XML inside XML comments well the original message showed that as one (of two) possibilities and the "small survey" refered to in the subject line was apparently asking if that was to be prefered (or not) over the alternative ReST markup. > is very readable and quite "writable" as well. it is just a nice way > to write comments and it quite easy to process into XHTML afterwards. well it depends. It often seems easier to write plain text (or only lightly marked up text) but the lessons of structured documents over the decades (latex, sgml, xml, ...) is that, on balance, markup is a good thing and the more of it you get and the earlier it's added, then the happier you will be in the long run. You see, I don't just hang around here for the fun of it, I actually believe in all this structured markup hype:-) David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
AW: AW: AW: [xsl] commenting and do, christof.hoeke | Thread | Re: AW: AW: AW: [xsl] commenting an, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] Generate N elements, Mukul Gandhi | Date | [xsl] xPath question, Jan Kohnert |
Month |