[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] XHTML [WAS: Grouping into a table (for vertical alignment)]
|
Subject: RE: [xsl] XHTML [WAS: Grouping into a table (for vertical alignment)] From: "Daniel Joshua" <daniel.joshua@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 17:53:31 +0800 |
With reference to http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#strict >3.1.1. Strictly Conforming Documents >A Strictly Conforming XHTML Document is an XML document that requires only the facilities described as mandatory in this specification. >Such a document must meet all of the following criteria: > >1. It must conform to the constraints expressed in one of the three DTDs found in DTDs and in Appendix B. > >2. The root element of the document must be html. > >3. The root element of the document must contain an xmlns declaration for the XHTML namespace [XMLNS]. >The namespace for XHTML is defined to be http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml. An example root element might look like: > ><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> > >4. There must be a DOCTYPE declaration in the document prior to the root element. >The public identifier included in the DOCTYPE declaration must reference one of the >three DTDs found in DTDs using the respective Formal Public Identifier. >The system identifier may be changed to reflect local system conventions. > >5. The DTD subset must not be used to override any parameter entities in the DTD. I believe you meant the above criteria. However, even if document does not strictly comply to the above, it should be still consider XHTML (just not strictly-conformant XHTML) as long as it is well-formed HTML. Well, I will the above changes to my stylesheet... Regards, Daniel -----Original Message----- From: Michael Kay [mailto:mhk@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, 26 May, 2004 4:03 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [xsl] XHTML [WAS: Grouping into a table (for vertical alignment)] > > As long as my HTML is well-formed, it is considered XHTML, right? > Wrong. Completely wrong. See the W3C XHTML spec. Michael Kay
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] RE: Testing values from p, Jeni Tennison | Thread | RE: [xsl] XHTML [WAS: Grouping into, Daniel Joshua |
| Re: [xsl] RE: Testing values from p, Jeni Tennison | Date | RE: [xsl] RE: Testing values from p, M. David Peterson |
| Month |