[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Marcus Andersson wrote:
For "urn:#MyHelperToGetData" to be a legal URI reference, "urn:" would need to be a legal URI. It isn't, because it's scheme-dependant part is empty (and even if is was, it would be an illegal URN because it doesn't have a URN NID, see RFC2141).
Regards, Julian
Re: [xsl] Removing namespaces
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Removing namespaces From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 23:20:14 +0200 |
Marcus Andersson wrote:
Julian Reschke wrote:
> Note that "urn:#MyHelperToGetData" is a really poor namespace name, as
it's not even a legal URI. (no, that doesn't affect XSLT processing).In what way isn't it a legal URI? (just curious since I don't know but I know all characters are legal (at least according to a WROX book I read))
For "urn:#MyHelperToGetData" to be a legal URI reference, "urn:" would need to be a legal URI. It isn't, because it's scheme-dependant part is empty (and even if is was, it would be an illegal URN because it doesn't have a URN NID, see RFC2141).
Regards, Julian
-- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Removing namespaces, Marcus Andersson | Thread | Re: [xsl] Removing namespaces, Marcus Andersson |
| Re: [xsl] Removing namespaces, Marcus Andersson | Date | Re: [xsl] Removing namespaces, Marcus Andersson |
| Month |
Keywords