[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

RE: [xsl] Using a custom URIResolver


Subject: RE: [xsl] Using a custom URIResolver
From: Björn Boxstart <Boxstart@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 10:30:03 +0200

Michael Kay wrote:
>I'm not sure there is a portable way to do this. Given a specific JAXP implementation (such as Saxon or Xalan) you can do it by making your
>URIResolver be a subclass of the standard URIResolver, and invoking the
>super.resolve() method. You could make it a bit more portable by having = your URIResolver accept a reference to the standard URIResolver
>using a setStandardURIResolver() method when it is first instantiated.

Thanks for your reaction. I'm indeed using trax (with xalan, I've should have told this in my previous email). The thing is that javax.xml.transform.URIResolver is an Interface and that I have not been able yet to find out which class implements this interface to perform as the standard URI resolver. So I don't know which class to subclass. Could you please explain what you mean with 'accept a reference to the standard URIResolver using a setStandardURIResolver()' method.
Do you mean that I add a public method 'setStandardURIResolver' to my own class that implements the interface (or to let the standard URI resolver be passed as a parameter in the constructor) and that the value being passed to this method can be retrieved from the transformer by using the 'getURIResolver()' method, or does this method only return a URI resolver in case you set your own resolver before?

Thanks in advance for your reaction!

Bjvrn


Current Thread