[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[xsl] Re: What is the future of XSL-FO
Subject: [xsl] Re: What is the future of XSL-FO From: "Celio Cidral Junior" <ccidral@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:37:12 -0300 |
Hi Micheal. "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu na mensagem news:200402272225.RAA10585@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Thanks for posting this hilarious bit of disinformation - hilarious except > for the worrying indication that you seem to take it seriously. Yes, I took it seriously. > Microsoft don't have an XSL-FO product. Therefore, they will rubbish the > XSL-FO standard. I think so. I mistrusted that disinformation. > You don't really read MSDN for independent objective > advice, do you? No, I do not. That's why I asked to this group, expecting an information with better precision. > XSL-FO has been a standard fully accepted by the World Wide Web consortium > since 15 Oct 2001. Yes, now I know. > Michael Kay Cheers, Celio Cidral Junior. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] unsuspected output, Jarno . Elovirta | Thread | Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors -, Jeff Kenton |
[xsl] unsuspected output, Nikolas Nehmer | Date | [xsl] Re: Re: What is the future of, Celio Cidral Junior |
Month |