[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[xsl] Re: Re: What is the future of XSL-FO
Subject: [xsl] Re: Re: What is the future of XSL-FO From: "Celio Cidral Junior" <ccidral@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:15:33 -0300 |
"G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu na mensagem news:5.2.0.9.0.20040227182721.01517148@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Both RenderX and Antenna House .NET connections ... what is the barrier to > commercial tools? The cost. > Can you consider only getting rid of commercial proprietary reporting > tools? By using a commercial XSL-FO tool you have the protection of > non-proprietary technology investment and flexibility to move your > intellectual property to other implementations. Good thoughts. I did not think about these other advantages. > Note there is more than one open source XSL-FO tools: FOP and xmlroff are > two that come to mind right away. I have seen a bit about thesse tools, but they are not .NET libraries. There is a port of FOP to J#; I ran some tests but it worked not; I'm still sweating for make it work. Cheers, Celio Cidral Junior XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: Re: What is the future of, Celio Cidral Junior | Thread | [xsl] Re: Re: What is the future of, Celio Cidral Junior |
[xsl] Re: Re: What is the future of, Celio Cidral Junior | Date | [xsl] unsuspected output, Nikolas Nehmer |
Month |