RE: [xsl] nodes or multiple runs?

Subject: RE: [xsl] nodes or multiple runs?
From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:01:41 -0000

> I remember someone posting the other day about the 
> performance difference between a chain and a single 
> stylesheet, and found the chain to be more efficient (I 
> think, I cant find the post now).

This was essentially a performance bug in temporary tree creation in
Saxon 6.5.x. It doesn't establish any general principles.

Michael Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] nodes or multiple runs?, (continued)
- Michael Kay - Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:58:55 -0000
  - Paul Tremblay - Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:11:37 -0500
- SHEIKH Sajjad - Wed, 11 Feb 2004 09:40:29 +0100
- Andrew Welch - Wed, 11 Feb 2004 09:42:44 -0000
  - Michael Kay - Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:01:41 -0000 <=
  - Paul Tremblay - Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:06:26 -0500
- cknell - Wed, 11 Feb 2004 05:54:35 -0500
  - Paul Tremblay - Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:14:07 -0500
- Andrew Welch - Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:13:09 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] nodes or multiple runs?, Andrew Welch	Thread	Re: [xsl] nodes or multiple runs?, Paul Tremblay
RE: [xsl] nodes or multiple runs?, Michael Kay	Date	RE: [xsl] How to filter element val, Michael Kay
	Month

	XML Editor \| XML Author \| WYSIWYG Editors \| Schema Editor \| XSD Documentation \| XSL/XSLT Editor \| XQuery \| XML Databases \| SVN Client © 2002-2011 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved. \| Sitemap \| Privacy Policy \| This website was created & generated with <oXygen/>®XML Editor

xml editor

RE: [xsl] nodes or multiple runs?