[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] FO Processor choice
Subject: RE: [xsl] FO Processor choice From: "Andrew Welch" <AWelch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:08:01 -0000 |
Just to finish the thread Ive decided to drop using FO all together. Currently I output xhtml, and I need some boilerplate text on my printed output. I thought about using FOP to get pdf, but this would mean maintaining two stylesheets - so bug fixes / extra functionality would need to be done twice, but possible. The real nail in the coffin was that FOP wasn't quite up to the job and a commercial processor would be needed. So now Im going to use IE's print ability with 'Print Templates' and an active x control. (http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/workshop/browser/hos ting/printpreview/reference/reference.asp) At first inspection they seem a really useful way to add functionality to your printed output (so one stylesheet + print templates and IE's print function means no need for FOP :) ...providing you can run trusted code of course. If anyone has an experiences of using print templates and wants to share please mail me off list. thanks andrew XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] FO Processor choice, Kielen, Agnes | Thread | [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, David Tolpin |
[xsl] Empty Elements in .NET, Greg Alvord | Date | Re: [xsl] Printing xml to paper and, Clay Hensley |
Month |
Keywords