[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl
Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl From: "Jim Fuller" <jim.fuller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 00:06:02 -0000 |
> > Actually, the way XSLT 2.0 is going, I'd much prefer XSLT > 1.1 or 1.5: Submit your comments re XSLT 2.0, it's a completely democratic process..... > > add the grouping and date handling, remove the nodeset/rtf > > distinction, and fix a couple of other warts in XSLT 1.0. *That* > > would be a killer language. Where is the battle, XSLT 2.0 has grouping and date handling in spades...and has removed the need for nodeset. > > The situations that demand input/output validation and XQuery > > integration are totally separate domains. That greatly complicates > > XSLT 2.0, and obscures the fact that part of XSLT 2.0 is XSLT 1.0 - > > warts + fixes. Huh ? This doesn't make any sense, part of XSLT 2.0 is XSLT 1.0. Cheese and onions, Jim Fuller XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Michael Fuller | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Jim Fuller |
RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Jim Fuller | Date | RE: [xsl] Re: XSLT vs Perl, Jim Fuller |
Month |