[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] FO Processor choice
Subject: Re: [xsl] FO Processor choice From: bry@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 19:54:26 CET |
I moved from FOP to antennaHouse, I found that my only problems were tables (not surprising, and easy to fix) and situations where I had used lists to make a split box, like content | matching content which I found were hard to fix, i.e lots of trial and error. > Von: Andrew Welch [mailto:AWelch@piper- group.com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Februar 2004 12:00 > An: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Betreff: [xsl] FO Processor choice > > ----- > > Has anyone started out with FOP and then had to 'upgrade' to a > commercial processor for any reason? Stability will be an issue, so > DT's words are a little worrying. What do Ken and DP think? (your > books are on order by the way :) > > ----- > > We did in fact started out with FOP for a little science project (just plain PDF output with little or no special needs at all). By now we're using XEP, because FOP crashed on larger documents. The difference between both is very small when using them as command line renderer (sorry, we didn't use server- side transformations). Another problem is that FOP's development seems to stall. > > Best regards, > > Maik Stührenberg > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] FO Processor choice, Maik Stührenberg | Thread | RE: [xsl] FO Processor choice, Kielen, Agnes |
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, bry | Date | [xsl] Printing xml to paper and pdf, Johnson, Kaerstin |
Month |