[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] The real harm is in functions with side effects (Was: Re: Using Extension Functions - Its Efficiency)
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] The real harm is in functions with side effects (Was: Re: Using Extension Functions - Its Efficiency) From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:21:55 +0400 (AMT) |
David Tolpin: > > What do you mean by > > first-order functions? Do you see it as a failing of XSLT or something > > that it should not be concerned about? > > First-order First-class functions, of course. I'm mixing terms all the way. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] The real harm is in funct, David Tolpin | Thread | [xsl] Re: The real harm is in funct, Dimitre Novatchev |
| [xsl] ID refs, Ricardo Saraiva | Date | [xsl] Problems reference Schema, Eder de Oliveira |
| Month |
Keywords