RE: [xsl] Re: Re: Should variable resolution be done at compile-time or run-time?

Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: Re: Should variable resolution be done at compile-time or run-time?
From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 21:24:38 +0100

> So, why do you think that:
> 
> >  the reference to the undeclared
> > (or out-of-scope) variable does actually appear to be evaluated.

I stand corrected, I didn't read the posting carefully enough.

Michael Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] Should variable resolution be done at compile-time or run-time?, (continued) Lars Huttar - Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:22:26 -0500 Dimitre Novatchev - Sat, 18 Oct 2003 10:46:21 +0200 Michael Kay - Sun, 19 Oct 2003 07:47:23 +0100 Dimitre Novatchev - Sun, 19 Oct 2003 10:43:53 +0200 Michael Kay - Sun, 19 Oct 2003 21:24:38 +0100 <=

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
[xsl] Re: Re: Should variable resol, Dimitre Novatchev	Thread	[xsl] to generate <table columns> w, SANWAL, ABHISHEK (HP
[xsl] XSL-FO Property Resolution / , Stefan Hermann	Date	[xsl] sort problem, Edward Maesen
	Month

	XML Editor \| XML Author \| WYSIWYG Editors \| Schema Editor \| XSD Documentation \| XSL/XSLT Editor \| XQuery \| XML Databases \| SVN Client © 2002-2011 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved. \| Sitemap \| Privacy Policy \| This website was created & generated with <oXygen/>®XML Editor

xml editor

RE: [xsl] Re: Re: Should variable resolution be done at compile-time or run-time?