[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Rob,
At 02:07 PM 9/2/2003, you wrote:
It's reasonable, although
match="section[preceding-sibling::*[not(self::title)]]"
is perhaps a little more elegant. And it's namespace safe. (The way you did it is necessary when testing attributes, however, since the self:: axis won't select attributes.)
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Re: [xsl] testing for preceding-sibling's
Subject: Re: [xsl] testing for preceding-sibling's From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 15:37:58 -0400 |
Rob,
At 02:07 PM 9/2/2003, you wrote:
so far, what seems to work is
match="section[preceding-sibling::*[local-name() != 'title']]"
as in, match any section that has at least one non-title preceding sibling.
is that a reasonable way to do it? or is there a much more elegant way i'm missing?
It's reasonable, although
match="section[preceding-sibling::*[not(self::title)]]"
is perhaps a little more elegant. And it's namespace safe. (The way you did it is necessary when testing attributes, however, since the self:: axis won't select attributes.)
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] testing for preceding-sibling, Robert P. J. Day | Thread | [xsl] How to get unique attribute v, Dipesh Khakhkhar |
Re: [xsl] XSL design question, Tom Schutzer-Weissma | Date | RE: [xsl] Unknown error in Xpath, Michael Kay |
Month |
Keywords