[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Sorting Upper-Case first. Microsoft bug?
Subject: Re: [xsl] Sorting Upper-Case first. Microsoft bug? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:14:03 +0100 |
> The alphabet David Carlisle required in his example runs > ...VvWwXx... and the adjacent symbols are distinct and not variants. Yes but I didn't require this (it wasn't my original posting). What I claimed (and still do, to be honest) is that this is the ordering specified by the XSLT 1 specification. there is no doubt that other orderings are more useful for natural language, and this is addressed in xslt 1 by processor specific extensions and in xslt 2 by explict collation support. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Sorting Upper-Case first., David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] Re: Merging attribute values , James Cummings |
Re: [xsl] Re: Incrementing a Global, Rajendra S Rawat | Date | Re: [xsl] Incrementing a Global var, Rajendra S Rawat |
Month |
Keywords