[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
RE: [xsl] newbie Q: is xsl going away?
Subject: RE: [xsl] newbie Q: is xsl going away?|
From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 22:56:27 +0100
> What I wonder about is the 'hopefully' in the statement you cite:
> At 11:07 AM 8/22/2003, Tommie wrote:
> >At 10:35 AM -0400 8/22/03, Kucera, Rich wrote:
> > >Vendor spokesmodels keep repeating the assertion that XSLT is
> > >hopefully going away. Is this true,
> >Highly unlikely (at least in the next 5 years). Interest in XSLT
> >training is up, subscriptions to XSL-List are up, as is traffic....
> Why are vendors hopeful that it'll go away, or why do they
> believe we would
> welcome its disappearance?
There are several vendors trying to sell competing technologies to XSLT,
so of course they are hopeful that it will go away. I think nearly all
the criticisms I see nowadays are from people who are trying to sell
their own proprietary transformation language.
The remarkable thing is how successful XSLT has been despite its
challenging learning curve.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
- Re: [xsl] newbie Q: is xsl going away?, (continued)
- B. Tommie Usdin - Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:07:03 -0400
- Jeff Kenton - Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:27:32 -0400
- Wendell Piez - Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:15:37 -0400
- David Mitchell - Fri, 22 Aug 2003 15:40:47 -0500
- Michael Kay - Fri, 22 Aug 2003 22:56:27 +0100 <=
- Marty McKeever - Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:14:51 -0400
- Michael Kay - Fri, 22 Aug 2003 18:46:41 +0100
- Kucera, Rich - Mon, 25 Aug 2003 14:29:57 -0400
- Kucera, Rich - Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:23:51 -0400