[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

RE: [xsl] which schema validators currently support dangling types? does system.xml on the .net platform do it?


Subject: RE: [xsl] which schema validators currently support dangling types? does system.xml on the .net platform do it?
From: "Richard Lander" <rlander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 16:03:32 -0700

I read that same document, a long time ago.

Can you include an example of a dangling type for those of us that have
forgotten ...

Thanks,

Rich

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of SANWAL,
ABHISHEK (HP-Houston)
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:56 PM
To: XSL-List@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [xsl] which schema validators currently support dangling types?
does system.xml on the .net platform do it?

Hi

I came across a best practices whitepaper on xfront.com that suggested
"dangling" types as the best way for creating variable content container
elements.

But of course this article was written in 2001 and it mentions the
inadequacy of the validators at the time.

I do understand that this might be the wrong place but since this is
critical to the application of my stylesheets I am posting a question
and if the moderators feel that this is not a valid message please do
let me know and feel free to remove it.

"Would it be possible for some of the more experienced thinkers out here
to give some insights as to which engines currently support dangling
types in a schema (XSD) and whether or not .NET system.xml classes would
support the same?"

I'll appreciate some insight. Thanks.

Abhishek Sanwal

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list




 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread
Keywords