[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
andrew.curry@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Try Xerces-Java. It is a bit better when it comes to XSD validation.
File a bug for Xerces-C.
BTW what does this have to do with XSL?
J.Pietschmann
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Re: [xsl] Re: decent validator
Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: decent validator From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@xxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 20:49:10 +0200 |
andrew.curry@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Does anyone know of a decent schemer validator for unix?
Try Xerces-Java. It is a bit better when it comes to XSD validation.
any ideas?
File a bug for Xerces-C.
BTW what does this have to do with XSL?
J.Pietschmann
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: decent validator, andrew . curry | Thread | RE: [xsl] How do we compare (diff) , Michael Kay |
RE: RE: [xsl] Contents of a <div> i, cknell | Date | AW: [xsl] <xsl:output>doesn't like , Markus Abt |
Month |
Keywords