[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Re: [meta] why post? [was] CSS
Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: [meta] why post? [was] CSS From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 16:47:48 +0100 |
Mike Haarman says that Mike Brown wrote > point. It seemed like an innocuous suggestion, to me, since even if I had not > correctly guessed what the original poster meant, making the suggestion > to use xsl:comment to generate comments was sure to benefit *somebody*. > It's becoming an increasingly rare event when I feel like helping anyone on > this list anymore. although it hasn't reached here yet (so i'm not sure of the full context of the quote) Sorry if my followup caused offence. I think after a week of threads on getting data out or putting data in to CDATA sections, I felt moved to comment adversely on a suggestion to hide some more document content:-) Probably my email was too terse (not for the first time...) David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: [meta] why post? [was] CS, Mike Haarman | Thread | [xsl] Using copy to change a node, , John Reid |
Re: [xsl] Sorting Upper-Case first., Mukul Gandhi | Date | RE: [xsl] Sorting Upper-Case first., Michael Kay |
Month |