[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Sorting Upper-Case first. Microsoft bug?
Subject: Re: [xsl] Sorting Upper-Case first. Microsoft bug? From: Mukul Gandhi <mukulw3@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 08:43:33 -0700 (PDT) |
Hi David, Why it should be called a processor bug?? Processors are producing correct result with *all alphabet* strings..(and respecting the definition of lexicographic sorting) .. A different behaviour(*for strings having numbers*) can be seen as there extensions and should be accepted. Regards, Mukul --- David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Please correct me if i am wrong.. > > well it seems you are correct in your description on > what's happening > but that must be a processor bug (even if it occurs > in two processors). > > David > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star > Internet. The > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more > information on a proactive > anti-virus service working around the clock, around > the globe, visit: > http://www.star.net.uk > ________________________________________________________________________ > > XSL-List info and archive: > http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Sorting Upper-Case first., David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Sorting Upper-Case first., David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] How do we compare (diff) , Mukul Gandhi | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: [meta] why post? [was, David Carlisle |
Month |