[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML
Subject: RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML From: "Claudio Russo" <crusso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:55:10 -0300 |
David, Thanks for your answers. Let me wrap up. 2) So users with IE 4.0 or Netscape 4.0 will not be able to execute the attached code, unless they have installed this compatibility feature (msxml3)? 3) When you mean "using a standard language", you are talking to apply straight the standard specifications for XSLT 1.0? What about the features not available, use javascript or any other language? If I don't have access to a server (I did some applications in a free site hosting), the transformations aren't done in this case in the client side? 4) Maybe I write it wrong, but I see in this list that some people use XSLT Saxon implementation, some MS implementation, and some others. Does this mean for instance that if someone implemented an application using Saxon features, other like me, using IE 6.0 will not be able to browse her/his Saxon page? 5) If I start using XSLT 2.0 language definition, will my IE 6.0 browser be able to view this application? What about the rest? Regards, Claudio. -----Original Message----- From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Martes, 01 de Julio de 2003 09:25 a.m. To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML > I have the code that follows. > In my machine I have IE 6.0, and MSXML 4.0. Then you can use XSLT. MSXML4 _only_ implements XSLT, not the language that you were using. MSXML3 (as used in IE6) implements both XSLT and the microsft-specific wd-xsl language that your stylesheet used. > 2) Does for instance a user of IE 6.0 be able to view the results and one of IE 4.0 not? Clearly IE4 and IE5, which predate the publication of XSLT do not implement XSLT, neither does xmosaic version 1 or other old browsers. IE5 can use XSLT if you install msxml3 in "replace mode". > 3) Which is the best approach to develop in a neutral environment that > be accesible for everyone (or at least 90% of the www users, not an > enterprise environment, where will be easy to install all the set > up required)? Use a standard language XSLT not a language that is only supported in old Microsoft products. If you want to support old browsers, do the conversion on the server, and serve html. > 4) Why do we talk of different engines like Saxon, MS, etc.? Because they are XSLT systems, and this is XSL-list (I don't understand the question) David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML, Claudio Russo | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] Different Colors for Alte, Schwartz, Rechell R, | Date | Re: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML, David Carlisle |
Month |
Keywords