[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] number continuation problem


Subject: Re: [xsl] number continuation problem
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:20:35 +0100

<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" version="1.0"
>


<xsl:template match="node">
.<xsl:value-of select="
1 +
count(preceding-sibling::node) +
count(parent::if/preceding-sibling::if[count(node)&gt;count(following-sibling::*[1][self::else]/node)]/node) +
count(parent::else/preceding-sibling::if[position()&gt;1][count(node)&gt;count(following-sibling::*[1][self::else]/node)]/node) +
count(../preceding-sibling::else[count(node)&gt;=count(preceding-sibling::*[1][self::if]/node)]/node)
"/>.<xsl:value-of select="."/>
</xsl:template>


</xsl:stylesheet>


> Now, if you make it handle nested if/else's within nodes that would be
> special :)

depends how you want them to be counted. Since the code above only uses
sibling and parent axes, not following or ancestor for example, it is
naturally scoped to the parent of your sibling if and else nodes.
So you should be able to make 1.2.3 style numbering easily enough.
If however you actually want a continuous decimal numbering across nodes of
arbitrary depth then more or less you would need to change
preceding-sibling to preceding, and er, then change whatever else needs
changing to what it needs changing to.

David

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread