[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Using or ignoring Types in XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0
Subject: Re: [xsl] Using or ignoring Types in XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 From: "Mike Haarman" <mhaarman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 14:38:11 -0500 |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> > The error isn't recoverable, but it is preventable. Before attempting > the conversion of a string to a dateTime, you can test: > > <xsl:if test="$x castable as xs:dateTime"> Thanks Michael, that's what I was missing. This just invokes the lexical parsing of $x and compares with the lexical requirements for xs:dateTime, correct? Or is its behavior more determined than that? Just a minor nit, wouldn't syntactic consistency suggest *castable-as* for the operator name? Is it really two tokens? Mike XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Using or ignoring Types i, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Using or ignoring Types i, Jeni Tennison |
RE: [xsl] Dynamically changing and , Passin, Tom | Date | Re: [xsl] Perpetuating xsl instruct, Alan Gardner |
Month |