[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
I've observed a team of developers using XSLT as a build tool to generate C++ code, instead of using the UML tool that had been selected for them (Rhapsody). They modelled various aspects of the problem domain using XML, and used XSLT templates to pump out C++.
Reasons for their decision to go down this path included the precise control they could exercise over the code generation framework and hence the generated code, the ease of revising the XML inputs and XSLT templates, and the seamless fit with their Unix based ClearCase configuration management and "make" based build scripts.
How common is this approach? Anyone else have experience long-term applying a similar approach?
- Mitch
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
[xsl] XSLT In the Build Process?
Subject: [xsl] XSLT In the Build Process? From: Mitch Amiano <mitch.amiano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 15:54:20 -0400 |
I've observed a team of developers using XSLT as a build tool to generate C++ code, instead of using the UML tool that had been selected for them (Rhapsody). They modelled various aspects of the problem domain using XML, and used XSLT templates to pump out C++.
Reasons for their decision to go down this path included the precise control they could exercise over the code generation framework and hence the generated code, the ease of revising the XML inputs and XSLT templates, and the seamless fit with their Unix based ClearCase configuration management and "make" based build scripts.
How common is this approach? Anyone else have experience long-term applying a similar approach?
- Mitch
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] fop and internet explorer, cknell | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT In the Build Process, J.Pietschmann |
RE: [xsl] Process HTML Doc with XSL, Passin, Tom | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT In the Build Process, Dion Houston |
Month |