[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Re: document not there ambiguity
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: document not there ambiguity From: Daniel Veillard <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 02:42:16 +0200 |
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 11:57:51PM +0200, J.Pietschmann wrote: > If you dig deeper you'll uncover a lot more problems with document(), > both for users and implementors. For example, accessing the URL might > have side effects in the server, and some people want to access the URL The people who still don't understand that GET should not have side effects deserve to have failing code, failing business and get back to reading specs. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Re: document not there am, J.Pietschmann | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: document not there am, Robert Koberg |
| RE: [xsl] Confounded by grand-paren, Jon Steeves | Date | RE: [xsl] Re: document not there am, Robert Koberg |
| Month |
Keywords