[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Comparison evaluation in XPath
Subject: Re: [xsl] Comparison evaluation in XPath From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 17:01:34 GMT |
3 > 2 > 1 would be reduced first to true > 1 which would evaluate to false. But shouldn't the answer be true? It depends what you mean by "should". You gave an accurate description of why it should and does return false. The fact that the 9 characters 3 > 2 > 1 parse as (3 > 2) > 1 using the more or less consistent grammar of Xpath but as (3 > 2) and (2 > 1) using the unspecified and probably unspecifiable grammar of conventional mathematical notation, and so produce different results shouldn't be surprising should it? David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Comparison evaluation in XPat, Gregory Murphy | Thread | Re: [xsl] Comparison evaluation in , Gregory Murphy |
Re: [xsl] Cold Fusion, Wendell Piez | Date | [xsl] Legal Match ?, Karl Stubsjoen |
Month |
Keywords