[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Michael Kay wrote:
Using XSLT 1.1 element document works OK so far, but a general extension (not processor-specific) would make my XSLTs more processor independent.
exsl:document seems to be the best solution. Is there any reson why Saxon doesn't support it? (other than time constraints and the like)
Tobi
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Re: [xsl] N : M transformation
Subject: Re: [xsl] N : M transformation From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 11:09:36 +0100 |
Michael Kay wrote:
>> does Saxon 6.5.2 support >> http://www.exslt.org/exsl/elements/document/ >> > No, it doesn't.
Using XSLT 1.1 element document works OK so far, but a general extension (not processor-specific) would make my XSLTs more processor independent.
exsl:document seems to be the best solution. Is there any reson why Saxon doesn't support it? (other than time constraints and the like)
Tobi
-- http://www.pinkjuice.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] N : M transformation, Tobias Reif | Thread | RE: [xsl] N : M transformation, Michael Kay |
[xsl] 10 records per page, Mandeep S Dhadda | Date | Re: [xsl] N : M transformation, Tobias Reif |
Month |
Keywords