[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
James Fuller wrote:
This is the second time I've seen this said about our XSLT processor. What we have is not Xalan -- it is a custom implementation. It tends to run 10 - 20 times faster, depending on the test case.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Re: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt
Subject: Re: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt From: Jeff Kenton <jkenton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:49:03 -0400 |
James Fuller wrote:
...One of my colleagues forwarded this to me, I'm a bit skeptical that it can do what it says it can do....
...
http://www.datapower.com/products/customer_successes.html
read the recent xml-dev discussion on this lil green box.
as for 'is it possible', without seeing the price.....there is no reason why they didnt burn xalan onto a prom or/and have everything run in RAM........i also would note that xalan is not necc the quickest of the xslt processors out there.
This is the second time I've seen this said about our XSLT processor. What we have is not Xalan -- it is a custom implementation. It tends to run 10 - 20 times faster, depending on the test case.
-- -------------------------- Jeff Kenton Datapower Technology, Inc.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt, James Fuller | Thread | RE: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt, James Fuller |
RE: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt, James Fuller | Date | Re: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt, Kurt George Gjerde |
Month |
Keywords