Re: [xsl] a nicer total sibling count than this

Subject: Re: [xsl] a nicer total sibling count than this
From: "Stewart C. Russell" <scruss@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 22:25:44 -0400

Michael Kay wrote:


Using position() and last() will often be more efficient than using
count() and xsl:number, because they work on the current node list,
which you are using anyway to output the nodes.

thanks for that. Efficiency is important here, as it's likely that such a template would be called in the order of tens to hundreds of thousands of times in a typical dictionary.

And here's me thinking that TIMTOWTDI only applied to Perl ... ;-)

cheers,
Stewart

XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread

[xsl] a nicer total sibling count than this
- scruss - Wed, 18 Sep 2002 15:39:29 -0400
  - Message not available
    - Jeni Tennison - Wed, 18 Sep 2002 20:51:43 +0100
  - Michael Kay - Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:33:35 +0100
    - Stewart C. Russell - Thu, 19 Sep 2002 22:25:44 -0400 <=
  - <Possible follow-ups>
  - Wendell Piez - Wed, 18 Sep 2002 16:03:33 -0400
  - Macaulay,Malcolm (US) - Wed, 18 Sep 2002 15:05:44 -0500
    - Stewart C. Russell - Wed, 18 Sep 2002 21:55:05 -0400
  - scruss - Wed, 18 Sep 2002 16:37:25 -0400

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] a nicer total sibling cou, Michael Kay	Thread	Re: [xsl] a nicer total sibling cou, Wendell Piez
Re: [xsl] Problem using MSXML, Mike Brown	Date	Re: [xsl] replace < and > wit, Ming Yu
	Month

	XML Editor \| XML Author \| WYSIWYG Editors \| Schema Editor \| XSD Documentation \| XSL/XSLT Editor \| XQuery \| XML Databases \| SVN Client © 2002-2011 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved. \| Sitemap \| Privacy Policy \| This website was created & generated with <oXygen/>®XML Editor

xml editor

Re: [xsl] a nicer total sibling count than this