[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 15:18:04 +0100 |
> <fo:inline keep-together.within-line="always"> > > Being the exception? well that's not really an exception: the content of the fo:inline still gets dumped into the parent flow but its properties make it unbreakable the reason it doesn't break is that that property is set rather than the fact that it was in an fo:inline. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper, DPawson | Thread | RE: [xsl] tags?, Jarno . Elovirta |
| Re: [xsl] more encoding woe, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] more encoding woe, David Carlisle |
| Month |