[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Hi all,
I'm wondering about (what may be) a fine point of FO semantics.
Is there something about fo:inline that prevents them from breaking across lines?
I am seeing this behavior in RenderX XEP (a fine tool), but thought that inlines could break.
I'm prepared to use fo:wrapper to instigate momentary changes, say, into an italic face -- but had supposed fo:inline was the right way.
Can anyone shed light on this?
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
[xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper
|
Subject: [xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 19:00:22 -0400 |
Hi all,
I'm wondering about (what may be) a fine point of FO semantics.
Is there something about fo:inline that prevents them from breaking across lines?
I am seeing this behavior in RenderX XEP (a fine tool), but thought that inlines could break.
I'm prepared to use fo:wrapper to instigate momentary changes, say, into an italic face -- but had supposed fo:inline was the right way.
Can anyone shed light on this?
Thanks! Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] XSL FO< Chapter 18 of the XML, Elliotte Rusty Harol | Thread | Re: [xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper, J.Pietschmann |
| Re: [xsl] grouping after filtering , Joerg Heinicke | Date | [xsl] Unwanted Empty Elements from , Raheem Rufai |
| Month |
Keywords