[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Gustaf Liljegren wrote:
No, especially if you want to have the page number centered.
J.Pietschmann
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Re: [xsl] FO: blocks beside each other
Subject: Re: [xsl] FO: blocks beside each other From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 22:25:24 +0200 |
Gustaf Liljegren wrote:
I need to express this in FO:
| | | | | +----------------------------------------+ |
| | ABC-DEF-0521 45 | |
+----+----------------------------------------+----+
It's a page footer with two blocks in, one for page number, one for a document-id. I use to solve these cases with tables. In this case I'd have three cells where 1 and 3 have equal sizes, so the page number can be centered. The question is if there's a more effective way to have to blocks beside each other than using tables?
No, especially if you want to have the page number centered.
There's a lot of code for something that appears to be simple.
A wooden rod is simple too, but it ultimately consists of an awful lots of molecules arranged in a very complicated manner. You can go to subatomic levels if you want.
The point is: XSLFO provides basic blocks for describing a 2D layout. Most stuff embodying higher level concepts are stripped away and mapped onto combinations of more basic blocks. Effectivity in the sense of "number of elements to describe a certain layout" was not a concern.
From this point of view, fo:table is a bit misdesigned, because it has headers and footers to make the description of some real "high level" tables easy but is also the only way to describe a more general "grid" layout block, which you just encountered.
J.Pietschmann
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] FO: blocks beside each other, Gustaf Liljegren | Thread | [xsl] problem solved + xml.load que, Meir |
Re: [xsl] XSL getting started (on a, Terje Norderhaug | Date | Re: [xsl] CDATA question, Amy Cheung |
Month |