[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
At 09:44 13/06/2002 +0100, you wrote:
Tell that to my customer...
Actually, this system is quite old now (4 years), and encoding was not a so big issue at the time, in particular with databases. Does any database support UTF-8 searching now ?
--
Paul TERRAY - Documents Management Systems Engineer
email : terray@xxxxxxxxxxxx
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Re: [xsl] Problem parsing cp1252 with msxsl
Subject: Re: [xsl] Problem parsing cp1252 with msxsl From: Paul Terray <terray@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:16:48 +0200 |
At 09:44 13/06/2002 +0100, you wrote:
But since one of the main aims of XML is to produce portable documents why tie yourself to a proprietary encoding? Many XML parsers will not be able to deal with that encoding, If you use iso-8859-1 (latin 1) your document will be a lot more portable. If you used utf-8 (the default) then your document would work with all XML parsers.
Tell that to my customer...
Actually, this system is quite old now (4 years), and encoding was not a so big issue at the time, in particular with databases. Does any database support UTF-8 searching now ?
--
Paul TERRAY - Documents Management Systems Engineer
email : terray@xxxxxxxxxxxx
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Problem parsing cp1252 wi, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Problem parsing cp1252 wi, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] get the max-value, Antonio Fiol | Date | Re: [xsl] get the max-value, Mike Brown |
Month |
Keywords