[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] keys vs. parameters
Subject: RE: [xsl] keys vs. parameters From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 17:05:58 -0500 |
> Just use xsl:key as usual. This defines a key table for _all_ documents. How about for nodesets returned from an extension? > You just need to trust your processor not to actually build the table if > key() is never used on that document. (Mike Kay recently confirmed on > this list that saxon does this check) As soon as I get a chance I'm going to try plugging Saxon into things. The extensions all use JAXP these days so it should be pretty straight forward, but things are never that easy... XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] keys vs. parameters, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] keys vs. parameters, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] keys vs. parameters, Hunsberger, Peter | Date | [xsl] •, Greg Martel |
Month |