[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
RE: [xsl] XALAN-C++ Performance...
Subject: RE: [xsl] XALAN-C++ Performance...|
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 09:28:07 +0100
>Comparing Xalan-C++ using a wrapper around another implementation's DOM
and Saxon using its
>native implementation is hardly a fair comparison.
Of course it's fair. It provides a counterweight to all those people who
compare Xalan with its own native tree implementation to Saxon with a
Actually the lesson is important. All XSLT processors perform better if
they are allowed to build the tree themselves than if you supply a DOM
that was built using unrelated software.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list