RE: [xsl] XALAN-C++ Performance...

>Comparing Xalan-C++ using a wrapper around another implementation's DOM
and Saxon using its 
>native implementation is hardly a fair comparison.

Of course it's fair. It provides a counterweight to all those people who
compare Xalan with its own native tree implementation to Saxon with a
third-party DOM!

Actually the lesson is important. All XSLT processors perform better if
they are allowed to build the tree themselves than if you supply a DOM
that was built using unrelated software.

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list