[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
But without d-o-e is there any alternative? The only one I can imagine is using output-method text and reparse it
... as XML - can cause great problems, if the [] were not correct structured (in the sense of XML).
... as HTML - should cause no problems.
Joerg
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Re: [xsl] string replacement for HTML tags
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] string replacement for HTML tags From: Joerg Heinicke <joerg.heinicke@xxxxxx> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:59:18 +0200 |
but if you're in a situation where d-o-e is not supported then it doesn't work.
David
But without d-o-e is there any alternative? The only one I can imagine is using output-method text and reparse it
... as XML - can cause great problems, if the [] were not correct structured (in the sense of XML).
... as HTML - should cause no problems.
Joerg
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] string replacement for HT, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] string replacement for HT, Michael Kay |
| RE: [xsl] Fwd: Over/under trimming , Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Extending xsltproc?, Mathy V Arumugam |
| Month |
Keywords