[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why XSLT is better than JSP+Velocit y
Subject: RE: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why XSLT is better than JSP+Velocit y From: Bryan Kearney <bk@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:54:10 -0700 |
Tools is a major reason. There are not out of the box XSL tools for creating re-usable XSL "widgets". While the JSP ones may not be all they are cracked up to be, they sell better than no tool. -- bk > -----Original Message----- > From: Hunsberger, Peter [mailto:Peter.Hunsberger@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:32 PM > To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' > Subject: RE: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why XSLT is better than > JSP+Velocit y > > > > They know Java, they argue, so why bother with XSLT? > > One good reason: Java doesn't do the job easily. > > Since they should be separation presentation from business > logic (least of > all database logic) they should already understand that Java is not a > presentation language (not that HTML is much better, but > that's another > problem). There is a mismatch between the job to be done and the tool > (Java). Having Java tools create XML for presentation > manipulation via > XSLt is a good architectural separation of function that > allows each tool to > do what it is good at. > > I would also agree that you should consider eliminating JSP's > altogether. > With a good XML/XSLt framework the days of having to mix presentation > semantics and syntax should be rapidly disappearing. > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why X, Hunsberger, Peter | Thread | RE: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why X, Bryan Kearney |
Re: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why X, Robert Koberg | Date | RE: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why X, Bryan Kearney |
Month |