[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] Re: RE: Higher-Order Functions in XPath 2.0
Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: RE: Higher-Order Functions in XPath 2.0 From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 23:41:20 -0000 |
> To be strict, it seems that $a[$i], where $a contains a > sequence (not a > node-set) is not valid syntax according to the current WD. Or am I > wrong? > The semantic rules in the XPath 2.0 WD do currently say that $a in $a[$i] must consist entirely of nodes, but that restriction was not intended - regard it as an error in the document. The restriction was intended to apply only to the operands of the "/" operator, but found its way to the wrong place in the spec. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: RE: Higher-Order Function, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: RE: Higher-Order Func, Terje Norderhaug |
RE: [xsl] Alternative to variable i, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] Fw: develop content managemen, Robert Koberg |
Month |
Keywords