[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: mapping (Was: Re: [xsl] Re: . in for)
Subject: Re: mapping (Was: Re: [xsl] Re: . in for) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 11:38:23 GMT |
> which maps function A > Like this more and more! but you can't do this unless the data model allows functions. This is what you'd expect in most languages that have sequences and mapping operators. lisp, ML, Haskel, .... But currently not in XSLT. I think functions should be allowed as objects on the datamodel but I think the WGs still need a bit more convincing.... David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: mapping (Was: Re: [xsl] Re: . i, DPawson | Thread | RE: mapping (Was: Re: [xsl] Re: . i, Joerg Pietschmann |
RE: [xsl] Content constructors and , Michael Kay | Date | RE: Regular expression functions (W, Michael Kay |
Month |