[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: XPath's role (Was: Re: [xsl] Re: . in for)
Subject: Re: XPath's role (Was: Re: [xsl] Re: . in for) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:07:00 GMT |
Mike Kay > I've been wondering whether we should allow the "$" in name="$emps" to > remove the inconsistency. I think I'd rather the $ was removed from the xpath binding operators, if it can be done without too many parsing problems and without introducing keywords. I find having the $ there rather confusing. David (I suppose this should be back on the official xpath comment list...) _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XPath's role (Was: Re: [xsl] Re, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: XPath's role (Was: Re: [xsl] Re, Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] make error, libxslt-1.0.9, Daniel Veillard | Date | [xsl] Conditional Merge - what am I, Nate Austin |
Month |
Keywords