[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: XPath's role (Was: Re: [xsl] Re: . in for)


Subject: Re: XPath's role (Was: Re: [xsl] Re: . in for)
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:07:00 GMT

Mike Kay
> I've been wondering whether we should allow the "$" in name="$emps" to
> remove the inconsistency.

I think I'd rather the $ was removed from the xpath binding operators,
if it can be done without too many parsing problems and without
introducing keywords. I find having the $ there rather confusing.

David
(I suppose this should be back on the official xpath comment list...)

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread
Keywords