[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] limitations in different parsers
Subject: Re: [xsl] limitations in different parsers From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:04:05 GMT |
> that do not work well in another compliant parser. Two examples include: > > dynamic template names supported in xalan and not in XT I don't know what you mean by dynamic template names but if I guess correctly then that should not be supported by any parser should it (unless the XSLT system has extension functions providing this). xt can not be called a "compliant" xslt system in any case, development of xt finished before the XSLT spec was completed. > I assumed compliant XSL templates written in one parser would be > compliant in all. Was this a fair assumption? Note that it's not really the parser that you are concerned about here, many of the systems can use different XML parsers (eg any sax compliant parser) If you are using an extension feature in an extension namespace for one particular system, then clearly it will only work on that system. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] limitations in different pars, Kuhn, Allen | Thread | RE: [xsl] limitations in different , Kuhn, Allen |
Re: [xsl] Netscape changes font-siz, Thomas B. Passin | Date | [xsl] How to map XML to XML accordi, Roy_Lu |
Month |