[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Comparision of parsers
Subject: Re: [xsl] Comparision of parsers From: "cutlass" <cutlass@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:10:20 +0100 |
2 cents worth. as a rule of thumb xslt processor speeds are somewhat directly related to the underlying xml parser; a c++ sax parser is faster then a java sax parser is faster then a c++ dom implementation is faster then a java dom parser cheers, jim fuller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Bayes" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 3:45 PM Subject: RE: [xsl] Comparision of parsers > http://www.datapower.com/XSLTMark/ > > Ciao Chris > > XML/XSL Portal > http://www.bayes.co.uk/xml > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > > Mailer Mailer > > Sent: 08 October 2001 14:32 > > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [xsl] Comparision of parsers > > > > > > Hi there, > > > > I want a comparision list of most of the available > > xslt processors like XALAN, XT etc. > > If someone has done the benchmark of this please pass > > me this information. > > > > Thanks > > Deep > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, > > just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1 > > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > > > > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Comparision of parsers, Chris Bayes | Thread | Re: [xsl] Comparision of parsers, Sebastian Rahtz |
RE: [xsl] running saxon on commandl, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] running saxon on commandl, Sakaama Heesakkers |
Month |