[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Evan Lenz wrote:
I should have guessed SAXON was right... and have better read the XPath rec!
Thanks and sorry for the noise.
Eric
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Re: [xsl] Does the XML pseudo-namespace deserves a node?
Subject: Re: [xsl] Does the XML pseudo-namespace deserves a node? From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:01:14 +0200 |
Evan Lenz wrote:
Eric van der Vlist wrote:
I have noticed that Saxon (6.4.4) creates by default a namespace node for the XML "pseudo-namespace" (xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace") while libxslt (1.0.4-1) doesn't and was wondering which is the right behavior...
SAXON's is the correct behavior.[1]
I should have guessed SAXON was right... and have better read the XPath rec!
Thanks and sorry for the noise.
Eric
Evan Lenz XYZFind Corp.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath#namespace-nodes
-- See you in Scottsdale, Arizona. http://xmlconnections.com/xml/xmlfall2001/speakers.asp#evandervlist ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Does the XML pseudo-names, Evan Lenz | Thread | [xsl] Organizing list of items in H, Mulberry Technologie |
[xsl] Template Matching, Jeffrey Langdon | Date | RE: [xsl] SAXON and UTF-8, Michael Kay |
Month |