[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

RE: [xsl] FOO vs FO

Subject: RE: [xsl] FOO vs FO
From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:37:42 +0100

> Does anyone know why FOO was chosen to mean anything?
>
 
No, but someone has tried to find out...

See ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3092.txt

Mike Kay 

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] FOO vs FO, (continued) Chris Bayes - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:14:50 +0100 David Carlisle - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:17:46 +0100 Thomas B. Passin - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:18:56 -0400 Carmelo Montanez - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:35:46 -0400 Michael Kay - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:37:42 +0100 <= Richard Beels - Fri, 07 Sep 2001 11:45:48 -0400 Wendell Piez - Thu, 06 Sep 2001 13:49:38 -0400 Jennifer Hochgesang - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:39:36 -0500 Mitch C Amiano - Thu, 06 Sep 2001 16:47:20 -0400

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] FOO vs FO, (continued)
- Chris Bayes - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:14:50 +0100
- David Carlisle - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:17:46 +0100
  - Thomas B. Passin - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:18:56 -0400
    - Carmelo Montanez - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:35:46 -0400
- Michael Kay - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:37:42 +0100 <=
  - Richard Beels - Fri, 07 Sep 2001 11:45:48 -0400
- Wendell Piez - Thu, 06 Sep 2001 13:49:38 -0400
  - Jennifer Hochgesang - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:39:36 -0500
  - Mitch C Amiano - Thu, 06 Sep 2001 16:47:20 -0400

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] FOO vs FO, Carmelo Montanez	Thread	RE: [xsl] FOO vs FO, Richard Beels
RE: [xsl] FOO vs FO, Hewko, Doug	Date	RE: [xsl] XPath Question, Michael Kay
	Month

RE: [xsl] FOO vs FO

Products

Features

Shop

Resources

Support

Company